Mandiview takes the scans you already write on Chartink and runs them through a rules engine that records exactly what your entry, stop-loss and target would have done — across five years of history, and live through the trading day. No code. No orders placed. Your scans, your broker account, your rules.
No payment, no card. Invites go out in small batches and you'll hear back directly.
Illustrative rule set — these are settings you choose, not results.
Mandiview does not publish performance figures.
Built by one person, in the open. No tips, no calls, no track record being sold to you — Mandiview never tells you what to buy. It only tests what you already decided.
Would this have worked? Does it still work? And where exactly is it breaking?
The engine walks your rules candle by candle over historical data pulled with your own broker key. Entry is always the next candle's open, never the signal candle's close. When one candle contains both your stop and your target, the stop is assumed to hit first. Brokerage, STT, exchange fees, stamp duty and GST come off every trade, on both legs.
What it does not model: partial fills, thin liquidity, and the discipline it takes to keep following a rule set through a losing month. A backtest that flatters you is worthless.
When one of your scans fires during market hours, Mandiview opens a simulated position and manages it exactly as your rules say — trailing the stop, taking the target, squaring off at your cut-off time.
Nothing reaches an exchange. No order is placed, no money moves. You simply find out whether rules that looked good in history survive contact with a real market, before any capital is at stake.
Every simulated trade is journalled with its entry reason, its exit reason, and the excursion it travelled on the way — how far underwater it went before it worked, and how far into profit it went before it didn't.
That excursion is the useful number. It is what tells you whether your stop is too tight or your target is out of reach — which is a question about your rules, not a prediction about the market.
In your own Chartink account, with your own conditions. Mandiview never writes the scan and never suggests one.
Chartink sends the alert to your private Mandiview webhook URL. One paste, once.
Stop-loss, target, trailing step, position size, max open positions, square-off time — separately for each strategy.
It paper-trades every alert during market hours, and backtests those same rules over history whenever you ask.
No — and that distinction is the whole design. Mandiview is not registered with SEBI as an Investment Adviser or as a Research Analyst, and it does not give advice, publish research, or recommend any security. It never tells you what to buy, when to buy it, or what to expect. It takes rules you have already written and reports what those rules did. If you want advice, speak to a SEBI-registered adviser.
Trades in Mandiview are simulated. No order is sent to any exchange and no money moves. Mandiview never holds funds and cannot withdraw from your account.
That said — testing a rule set is not the same as it working. Nothing here predicts the market, and trading real money on any rule set carries a real risk of loss.
A Chartink account you already use for scanning, and a Dhan account for market data. Mandiview connects to your Dhan account with your own API key, so the data you see comes under your own licence rather than being redistributed by me.
One independent developer in India. Mandiview is not a company, not a fund, not a broker and not an advisory service. It started as a tool built for one person's own trading and is being opened to a small number of others.
Because it runs on one server with a fixed budget, and because I'd rather a handful of people have a working tool than a crowd have a slow one. Requests are reviewed and invites go out in batches.
It's free during early access, and pricing isn't decided yet. Whatever happens, you won't be charged without being told first, and nobody will be billed for something they signed up to when it was free.
Two reasons. Practically: any number I published would come from my rules on my settings, which tells you nothing about yours. Legally: performance claims by people who aren't SEBI-registered are a line worth staying well clear of.
You'll see the numbers your own rules produce, inside your own account, where they actually mean something.
Leave your email and I'll send an invite when the next batch opens.
No payment, no card. Already have an account? Log in.